访谈｜泰森食品中国区副总裁：我们与进博会“共同进化”******
(第五届进博会)访谈｜泰森食品中国区副总裁：我们与进博会“共同进化”
中新社上海11月4日电 题：访谈｜泰森食品中国区副总裁：我们与进博会“共同进化”
作者 高志苗
在泰森食品展区，积木沙盘里“泰森号”货船从美国出发，载满牛肉原料漂洋过海来到中国……第五届中国国际进口博览会(以下简称“进博会”)即将召开，为了让观众更直观地感受企业在中国的数字化转型实践，泰森食品用积木沙盘还原了进口加工全链路，并且通过AR增强现实技术沉浸式体验泰森智慧工厂。
“我们每年都通过进博会感受中国市场的巨大潜力和近年来持续优化的国际营商环境。总的来说，我们把进博会当作重要的年度沟通平台，展示自己的同时也接受市场、行业和消费者的反馈。”泰森食品中国区副总裁陆悦飞近日接受中新社记者专访时表示。
连续三年参展，泰森食品已经不满足于仅仅展示产品，更多的是传递理念。“我们所倡导的是有‘共生’意义的产业链和价值链，”陆悦飞说，“这样既有助于让中国消费者获得更多元化的选择，也能够借助进博会的‘窗口效应’让国内消费者了解泰森更多的海外产品，有效推动国内国际双循环发展。”
泰森食品和进博会“共成长”。2020年，首次参加进博会的泰森食品将泰森中国地区总部签约落户上海；2021年，在第四届进博会上泰森中国宣布进入数字化转型元年。
“今年，我们的数字化转型有了阶段性成果，首个泰森中国智慧工厂已竣工投产，我们通过AR技术将智慧工厂车间搬到进博会现场。期待围绕进博会这个大IP，通过丰富的活动连接上下游伙伴，让他们参与到进博会这个大主题中，真正将进博会从6天展期延伸到365天，让我们的进口产品能够买得到、进得来、卖得出，我们与进博会共创共生，共同进化。”陆悦飞说。
作为世界500强企业，泰森食品早在2001年便进入中国市场，目前泰森食品在中国拥有三家研发中心、七大加工厂、数十家养殖农场，提供鸡、猪、牛肉全品类食品综合解决方案，深耕中国是泰森食品始终的选择。
从一片荒地到智慧工厂拔地而起，日前，泰森食品用10个月的时间建成了首个泰森中国智慧工厂。“我们用行动说明在华发展的信心，刚刚建成的日照智慧化工厂投资了3000多万美金，南通、湖北的智慧工厂也正在加紧建设。速度背后都是因为看好市场，希望在这个地方为消费者提供更好的服务。”
先行一步的泰森中国也在整个集团树立了“数字化转型样板”。“综合来看，中国区的数字化转型进展在整个集团的地位是突出的。我们有很棒的合作伙伴、团队，中国在这方面的技术储备、供应商、软件硬件的解决方案都非常多。是国家红利、企业战略以及团队执行使得我们领先。”
陆悦飞表示，未来，泰森食品将进一步扩大在华投资和销售，致力于用安全、健康、优质的高蛋白产品，丰富中国消费者的餐桌，改善中国消费者的健康饮食结构。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 快三投注地图 |
